Why sentiment is key to stock market’s direction

As published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune 8/16/19.

Investors’ optimism is being tested.

The rally in U.S. stocks that began a day after Christmas has (so far) survived the following: An escalating trade war with China, slowing growth in the global economy, an uncertain future for Europe and political unrest in Hong Kong.

The latest land mine to navigate appeared this week when the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield fell below the two-year yield. While other parts of the yield curve have previously inverted at various times in the last 12 months, the 10-year vs. two-year inversion is most widely considered a strong warning of a looming economic recession.

To be clear, an inversion does not imply a recession is imminent. It is, however, another weight on the shoulders of investors trying to maintain their confidence. Whether or not the stock market rewards that confidence with gains in the months to come is based primarily on two factors: Federal Reserve policy and investor sentiment.

Rate cut already factored in

“Don’t fight the Fed” has been a rallying cry among investors for more than a decade.

Ever since its first round of quantitative easing began in November 2008 under then-Chairman Ben Bernanke, the Fed has helped foster a financially friendly environment in which stocks have thrived. Regardless of how strong or weak the economy may have appeared, the argument could be made that favorable policy from America’s central bank would ultimately drive equity prices higher.

The significance of Fed policy on the stock market has been especially obvious recently. After slow-but-steady interest rate increases in 2018 fanned concerns of choking off economic growth, equities sold off 20% in the fourth quarter. The Fed then calmed investor sentiment and spurred the current rally by pausing its rate increases in January and preaching patience regarding future hikes. Long story short: Too many Fed hikes led to a 20% correction. A pause and (eventual) rate cut by the Fed contributed to a 25% rally.

The good news is the Fed will almost certainly cut rates at least once more before year-end. The bad news is those expectations may already be reflected in the market. If that’s the case, the positive effects may be minimal once implemented.

When investors ask why

Market sentiment, it seems, has been tied almost exclusively to Fed policy. But what happens when investors stop focusing on the policy and instead consider the reasons why those fiscal decisions are deemed necessary?

The answer can be found by looking at Europe. In many ways, Europe and the U.S. are navigating a similar economic climate. Unlike in America, however, years of aggressive central-bank stimulus in Europe and the resulting negative interest rates have not led to investor optimism or strong equity returns. It’s true that uncertainty surrounding Brexit and the evolving future of the eurozone add an extra layer of anxiety for Europeans. Generally, however, it’s the sentiment, not the symptoms, that is drastically different.

None of this is meant to raise any particular alarm about the state of the U.S. stock market. Trading around 16 times forward earnings estimates after an ugly week on Wall Street, valuations for the S&P 500 remain reasonably priced and cheaper than their five-year average.

Uncertainty and the U.S. economy

Experience has taught us that people tend to underestimate the resilience of the U.S. economy, which despite slowing growth is in better condition than its global counterparts. Our economy is more diverse, energy-independent, and less export-driven than the rest of the world.

In 2018, exports made up only 8% of America’s gross domestic product (GDP). That’s a considerably lower portion than other major economies like Japan (15%), the U.K. (17%), China (19%) and the eurozone (20%). In many emerging market countries, exports make up 30% or more of those economies. While much of the world may be held hostage by global trade uncertainty, the U.S. economy is less affected, relatively speaking.

The primary point is that sentiment can be a powerful driver of short-term market movements. This has worked in the market’s favor for the last 10 years. The continuation of friendly Fed policy will certainly help, but consider this a reminder that the Fed is not a cure-all for the world’s weakening economic condition.

At some point, earnings and economic data will become more important drivers of the market’s direction than news conferences held by Jerome Powell. It’s certainly possible the data will be positive enough to keep this rally going.

Long-term, as we’ve seen in Europe, monetary policy will not be enough.

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and may not be invested into directly.

Recent Posts:

Big news seldom fazes markets, but keep an eye on smaller stuff

/
While preparing for a review meeting with a client earlier this month, we waited for President Donald Trump to address the nation. It was the morning after Iran had fired missiles at U.S. military bases in Iraq. Although tensions in the Middle East have simmered down (relatively speaking) since the first week of January, it seemed Trump's first official public comments were worthy of our attention.

Another year of hedge fund not earning their keep

/
A typical hedge fund requires that any interested buyer first meet the definition of an "accredited investor." That usually means a person who earns at least $250,000 per year or has a net worth of at least $5 million. If you have ever thought about investing in a hedge fund, perhaps you considered that threshold unreasonable. These days, it's something to be thankful for.

Here's what bonds are trying to tell us

/
There's a long-held belief on Wall Street that if you want to understand what the smart money is doing, look at the bond market. That's not to say the most successful investors favor bonds over stocks, but rather that trends among bond investors have historically been more reliable indicators of future economic developments.

Big news seldom fazes markets, but keep an eye on smaller stuff

/
While preparing for a review meeting with a client earlier this month, we waited for President Donald Trump to address the nation. It was the morning after Iran had fired missiles at U.S. military bases in Iraq. Although tensions in the Middle East have simmered down (relatively speaking) since the first week of January, it seemed Trump's first official public comments were worthy of our attention.

Another year of hedge fund not earning their keep

/
A typical hedge fund requires that any interested buyer first meet the definition of an "accredited investor." That usually means a person who earns at least $250,000 per year or has a net worth of at least $5 million. If you have ever thought about investing in a hedge fund, perhaps you considered that threshold unreasonable. These days, it's something to be thankful for.

Here's what bonds are trying to tell us

/
There's a long-held belief on Wall Street that if you want to understand what the smart money is doing, look at the bond market. That's not to say the most successful investors favor bonds over stocks, but rather that trends among bond investors have historically been more reliable indicators of future economic developments.

Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA / SIPC. Investment Advice offered through Marks Group Wealth Management, a registered investment advisor and separate entity from LPL Financial. The LPL registered representatives associated with the website may only discuss securities or transact business with persons who are residents of: AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, FL, IA, IL, IN, KY, ME, MI, MN, MO, NC, ND, NE, NY, OH, OK, OR, SC, TX, VA, WI.
Barron’s Top Financial Advisors (2010-2019) is based on assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, quality of practice and philanthropic work.
The Forbes Best-In-State Wealth Advisor (2018-2019) and the Forbes America’s Top Wealth Advisors (2017) are based on client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms.