The S&P 500 has never been more top heavy

As published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune 08/15/2020.

Never before has the S&P 500 been as top-heavy as it is now.

The five largest companies by market capitalization (Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet) comprise more than 22% of the index. Those five companies have as much influence on benchmark performance as the bottom 363 companies combined. When it comes to the most widely cited index for U.S. equities, not all stocks are weighted equal.

Earlier this month, Apple grew big enough to represent 6.5% of the S&P 500, breaking IBM’s previous record set in 1985. Is Apple really 27 times more valuable than Goldman Sachs? Is Microsoft 12 times more valuable than Medtronic? Is Facebook 13 times more valuable than FedEx?

If we are measuring by market-cap, the answer is yes. Yet, when it’s time to make your next 401(k) contribution, are you comfortable investing so much more money in those companies just because they are big?

The S&P 500 being dominated by a few companies isn’t new, but the concentration is more extreme. Over the last 25 years, the five largest stocks represented about 13% of the index, on average. In 1999, during the dot-com bubble, the number rose as high as 16%. It didn’t get that high again until 2018.

Some of this can be explained by innovation. The current formidable five created (or popularized) the smartphone, the personal computer, social media and online shopping. No American under age 30 can imagine life without them.

Aggressive acquisitions is another key. Alphabet (formerly Google) is a new-age conglomerate. Once defined by its internet search engine, the company now owns a little bit of everything: Android, YouTube and Motorola among them.

The rise of passive investing has contributed as well. Not all index funds, of course, are market-cap weighted, but the most popular ones certainly are. An investment approach predicated on “bigger is better” creates huge demand for the largest stocks based on size alone.

On top of all that, the seismic shift to a pandemic-induced work-from-home culture disproportionately benefited Big Tech stocks. Investors viewed their revenue streams as less affected by an economic shutdown.

While buying big has been a successful strategy this year, there are obvious risks. Investors buying new shares in the five biggest stocks will be chasing recent performance. Historically speaking, most companies that get near the top of the index are more likely to retreat than to grow those weightings further. There is also the threat, or inevitability, that some get dismantled through antitrust proceedings if the government deems it necessary.

Further, if you are betting on an economic recovery, many of these names could actually fare worse, relatively speaking. Much of their year-to-date gains are due to the extraordinary circumstances created by coronavirus. If conditions improve enough to warrant a more broad-based rebound in cyclical stocks, the S&P’s heaviest hitters could well end up lagging.

If nothing else, it’s healthy to understand what is driving index performance. The S&P 500 has outperformed its equal-weight equivalent by more than 700 basis points this year. It’s one more reminder there isn’t as much balance in the benchmark as there used to be.

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and may not be invested into directly.

Recent Posts:

Leading indicators support market strength

/
There is always an argument to be made that the stock market is overvalued. Here's a sampling of the current menu for pessimists: Fed tapering is imminent, Stubbornly high inflation, Earnings growth has peaked, Delta variant prolonging the pandemic, Supply chain disruptions. All of those are legitimate factors when considering economic outlooks, but don't forget the following...

'Follow the Fed' made sense for investors, but what about when the Fed's course is uncertain?

/
"Follow the Fed" has proven to be a relatively simple and successful investment strategy, but keeping up with the latest developments at our nation's central bank isn't as straightforward as it used to be.

Keep Strong Market Returns in Perspective

/
Face-to-face client meetings are a thing again in the Marks Group office. Oftentimes, those start with an exasperated retelling of trying times experienced during the pandemic, after which we usually conclude by saying, "At least the market is up!" The S&P 500 has gained nearly 20% year-to-date and more than doubled since its low-point 18 months ago. As of Aug. 31, the S&P had risen seven months in a row. Fifty-four times this year, it closed at an all-time high. The positive momentum, in other words, has been unrelenting.

Leading indicators support market strength

/
There is always an argument to be made that the stock market is overvalued. Here's a sampling of the current menu for pessimists: Fed tapering is imminent, Stubbornly high inflation, Earnings growth has peaked, Delta variant prolonging the pandemic, Supply chain disruptions. All of those are legitimate factors when considering economic outlooks, but don't forget the following...

'Follow the Fed' made sense for investors, but what about when the Fed's course is uncertain?

/
"Follow the Fed" has proven to be a relatively simple and successful investment strategy, but keeping up with the latest developments at our nation's central bank isn't as straightforward as it used to be.

Keep Strong Market Returns in Perspective

/
Face-to-face client meetings are a thing again in the Marks Group office. Oftentimes, those start with an exasperated retelling of trying times experienced during the pandemic, after which we usually conclude by saying, "At least the market is up!" The S&P 500 has gained nearly 20% year-to-date and more than doubled since its low-point 18 months ago. As of Aug. 31, the S&P had risen seven months in a row. Fifty-four times this year, it closed at an all-time high. The positive momentum, in other words, has been unrelenting.

The LPL registered representatives associated with the website may only discuss securities or transact business with persons who are residents of: AL, AZ, CA, CO, FL, IA, IL, IN, ME, MI, MN, MO, NC, ND, NE, NY, OK, OR, SC, TX, VA, WI.
Barron’s Top Financial Advisors (2010-2021) is based on assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, quality of practice and philanthropic work.
The Forbes Best-In-State Wealth Advisor (2018-2021) and the Forbes America’s Top Wealth Advisors (2017) are based on client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms.