The Fed helped revive stocks, but its actions created new risks

As published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune 09/12/2020.

Whatever it takes. That’s the unofficial policy the Federal Reserve has adopted in its mission to save the U.S. economy from the coronavirus. It’s also (by far) the biggest reason why stock prices have rallied more than 50% in less than six months.

To be sure, it’s appropriate that equities have responded positively to the largest batch of monetary stimulus in history. To put the Fed’s 2020 stimulus in perspective, it bought more bonds in one week in April ($625 billion) than in the entire eight-month QE2 phase in 2010-11. Some estimates suggest the Fed’s total balance sheet will reach $9 trillion-$10 trillion in assets by the time its pandemic-response measures are complete, roughly triple what it was a year ago.

If the Fed pulled out its bazooka to battle the Great Recession, it’s using tomahawk missiles against COVID-19. Massive liquidity injections and asset-buying have changed the formula investors use to value securities. That helps explain why the S&P 500 has become so disconnected from the underlying economic conditions.

Higher stock and bond prices are the most obvious result of historic Fed policy, but those benefits also create new risks. With only one relative precedent for a global pandemic (1918) and no precedent for deficit spending on this scale, traditional valuation methods seem less relevant than ever.

The S&P 500’s forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is approaching 23. That’s a 50% premium to its average P/E over the last decade. U.S. market capitalization relative to GDP (180%) has never been so elevated. Equities, in other words, are setting all-time highs based more on sentiment than on fundamentals.

The danger is that when optimism fades, there will be less structural support to slow the fall. We saw evidence of this in early September when the Nasdaq fell 10% in just three trading days despite very little news. While Fed intervention should mitigate the odds of another 35% collapse, investors should expect larger daily swings in stock prices will remain the norm.

Current Fed policy also discourages diversification. Of the three traditional asset classes (stocks, bonds and cash), two of them appear especially unattractive thanks to historically low interest rates. When the dividend yield of the S&P 500 (1.85%) is two-and-a-half times greater than the 10-year Treasury yield (0.72%), it’s hard to get excited about bonds. As a result, many investors have shifted toward more aggressive portfolios despite the risks. Cash, meanwhile, yields even less and is vulnerable to our next point of discussion.

Inflation was inevitable, but the Fed has accelerated its arrival. This might seem counterintuitive with the Fed Funds rate near zero, but unlimited money-printing has led to a weaker U.S. dollar. That means more dollars are required to purchase foreign goods, which contributes to inflation. The Fed last month also adjusted its official policy targets to allow for periods of higher inflation in order to spur job growth. And let’s not forget inflation will ease the burden of the largest-ever U.S. government debt.

The Fed has rescued financial markets, and while its policies have also encouraged some irrational behavior, these market conditions will likely persist until long after the economy recovers. Investors need to be mindful of the different risks we face in this new environment.

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and may not be invested into directly.

Recent Posts:

Extraordinary year offers familiar lessons for investors

/
No matter how much a global pandemic has changed our lives, some things remain the same. In many respects, we have never seen a year like 2020. That applies to financial markets as well.

Resist over-indulging on the hot stock flavor of the moment

/
With the presidential election now behind us, investors need a new uncertainty to ponder. Fortunately, the markets are seldom short on subject matter. The recent action in equities has been notable, not for how much stocks went up or down, but because of which stocks went up and down.

Why investors should resist the urge to reach for yield

/
“I can’t remember the last time we reached for yield and it worked out in our favor.” That was the first thought shared in a recent discussion at our office about the current market environment. All things being equal, investments that pay bigger dividends or higher interest rates sound more attractive. The problem, of course, is that things are almost never equal.

Extraordinary year offers familiar lessons for investors

/
No matter how much a global pandemic has changed our lives, some things remain the same. In many respects, we have never seen a year like 2020. That applies to financial markets as well.

Resist over-indulging on the hot stock flavor of the moment

/
With the presidential election now behind us, investors need a new uncertainty to ponder. Fortunately, the markets are seldom short on subject matter. The recent action in equities has been notable, not for how much stocks went up or down, but because of which stocks went up and down.

Why investors should resist the urge to reach for yield

/
“I can’t remember the last time we reached for yield and it worked out in our favor.” That was the first thought shared in a recent discussion at our office about the current market environment. All things being equal, investments that pay bigger dividends or higher interest rates sound more attractive. The problem, of course, is that things are almost never equal.

The LPL registered representatives associated with the website may only discuss securities or transact business with persons who are residents of: AL, AZ, CA, CO, FL, IA, IL, IN, ME, MI, MN, MO, NC, ND, NE, NY, OK, OR, SC, TX, VA, WI.
Barron’s Top Financial Advisors (2010-2020) is based on assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, quality of practice and philanthropic work.
The Forbes Best-In-State Wealth Advisor (2018-2020) and the Forbes America’s Top Wealth Advisors (2017) are based on client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms.